Month: June 2025

What the Oilers might lose by moving on from Viktor Arvidsson

/ sunilagni / Leave a comment

Fair to say that the Edmonton Oilers front office will have a busy off-season. After a solid playoff run that again fell short, it’s imperative that they apply a critical lens, identify inefficiencies across the roster, and address the gaps to stay competitive.

Based on Stan Bowman’s recent media availability, it appears that the Oilers forward group will get the most attention from the front office. There’s likely going to be a push to shed some older players and make room on the regular roster for the few young prospects in the system. And there’s also the need to clear up cap space to sign key players such as Evan Bouchard and allocate dollars to address the goaltending.

One forward that the Oilers are currently looking to move on from is winger Viktor Arvidsson, as he’s in the last year of his two-year contract that pays $4 million this upcoming season. Arvidsson has had a solid career thus far, putting up 389 points in 612 games over eleven seasons. But this past regular season, his numbers slipped slightly as he put up 15 goals and 12 assists in 66 games (in all situations). At even-strength, Arvidsson ranked eighth among the Oilers forwards in terms of points per hour with 1.36. This was his lowest output since his rookie season.

.

While it does make some sense to reallocate his dollars to address other parts of the roster, it’s important to highlight what the Oilers will lose if/when they trade Arvidsson away.

The first thing that stands out when assessing Arvidsson is the positive impact he tends to have on his team’s ability to control the flow of play and scoring chances. Consistently over his career, his teams tend to do better with him on the ice than without him when it comes to puck possession and expected goals metrics. This past season, for instance, his on-ice Corsi For percentage (55 percent) and Expected Goals For percentage (56 percent) were both fifth best among Oiler forwards behind McDavid, Hyman, Draisaitl and Podkolzin. More on this in a second.

The table below shows Arvidsson’s on-ice shot-differential numbers relative to his teammates. Being above zero means that Arvidsson typically outperformed the team average, which is impressive considering how strong the Oilers’ underlying shot-share numbers were this past season. This trend has continued since his time in Los Angeles, and there doesn’t appear to be a significant drop-off in his performance just yet.

.

Slotting often into the top-six forward group, Arvidsson also played a chunk of his ice time against elite-level opponents and fared quite well. In 203 minutes at even-strength this season, Arvidsson’s Corsi For percentage against elite players was 57 percent – which ranked third among regular Oiler forwards. His Dangerous Fenwick, which is similar to expected goals, was at 59 percent and also one of the best on the team.

And while Arvidsson did play a lot with Draisaitl (394 minutes) and McDavid (82 minutes) at even-strength and posted great on-ice performance numbers with each of them, he also posted great numbers away from them. In 417 minutes without either of the star players on the ice with him this season, Arvidsson posted an on-ice Corsi For percentage of 53 percent and an Expected Goals For percentage of 51 percent. The actual results were a little lacking (48 percent goal-share, -1 goal differential), but that was also impacted by a lower-than-normal PDO of around 96.

One last thing worth pointing out is Arvidsson’s production in this year’s playoffs. He dressed for only 15 of the 22 games and finished 12th in even-strength ice time among forwards (164 minutes). But he did put up two goals and five assists in these limited minutes, which translates into a rate of 2.55 points per hour. That was the second highest among all Oilers forwards, only behind McDavid.

This isn’t to say Arvidsson is a perfect player — he’s not. But there’s going to be gaps that the Oilers will need to address if/when they move him out. He’s a reliable play driver who can play with and without a team’s best players. He can perform well against top-level competition. And he does have a history of relatively good production. These are things that the Oilers are likely cognizant of and will need to factor in when identifying and/or acquiring their replacement(s).

Teams that are considering acquiring Arvidsson would be getting a solid, experienced NHL winger. One that could help elevate a team’s ability to control the flow of play and increase their odds of outscoring opponents. They’d also be getting Arvidsson in a contract year, which could serve as a motivator for the player to keep his focus and hopefully productivity at the highest level. Arvidsson is also coming off a season where his on-ice PDO was close to 96, indicating that in the right situation, his rate of points could bounce back to his career levels. Definitely a buy-low candidate that could pay dividends for a team in tune with his underlying numbers and the Oilers’ desperation.

Data: Natural Stat Trick, Puck IQ, Puckpedia

Also posted at Oilersnation.

Losing the end game

/ sunilagni / Leave a comment

Disappointing end for the Edmonton Oilers who were defeated soundly by the Florida Panthers. After rolling through the western conference, dominating territorial play, and getting production from across the roster, the Oilers could not keep up with the Panthers. While there were some reasons for optimism after the first four games of the series, all of that was put to rest with the Panthers outscoring Edmonton 10-3 in games five and six. Florida had more high-quality players than Edmonton and controlled every facet of the game.

Here’s how the two teams compared in the final series at even-strength (5v5). The Panthers out-scored Edmonton 16-10 (a 62 percent goal-share), which aligned well with their underlying shot-share numbers. The Panthers titled the ice consistently, pouncing on the Oilers blunders, taking smart risks, sustaining pressure, and generating chances. And it was reflected in their Corsi for percentage (55 percent) and expected goals for percentage (57 percent) – just outstanding numbers which aligned with how they had performed in their first three rounds in the eastern conference.

The only time the Oilers were a threat against the Panthers at even-strength was when McDavid and Draisaitl were on the ice together. They played 70 minutes (about 20 percent of the Oilers total time) and posted a Corsi For percentage of 59 percent and an Expected Goals for percentage of 57 percent – indicating that the Oilers controlled the flow of play and scoring chances. The issue was that they could not finish their chances, scoring only one goal and allowing five against (a goal-share of 16 percent). That’s far below the results we would expect from the top two players in the world, but that’s how things can go in a short tournament.

When the two stars were playing apart from one another (about 80 minutes of ice time), the team could not control the flow of play or scoring chances. And when neither player was on the ice (174 minutes, or 53 percent of the team’s total time), the Oilers were absolutely dreadful. Their Corsi For percentage and Expected goals for percentage were below 40 percent. Florida’s middle order and depth players completely dominated the Oilers and they were lucky to break even in goals. Again, Edmonton did not have enough high-quality players and by the end of the series the club looked gassed. While it was important to add experience to the roster, you could tell throughout the series that the team lacked speed and quick decision-making to handle the Panthers forecheck.

Here’s how the Oilers skaters performed at even-strength in the six games against the Panthers. Only a handful of players posted on-ice shot-share numbers above 50 percent – just a dismal showing.

.

Losing Hyman and having Nugent-Hopkins and Ekholm injured played a big role in the Oilers overall performance and results. But there were a lot of self-inflicted problems as well. In goal, Edmonton knew what they had in Stuart Skinner as he has struggled to provide league-average goaltending for a few seasons now. On the back end, Edmonton knew what they had in Nurse and the negative impact he consistently has on his teammates and their on-ice numbers. And up front, Edmonton knew that more than a few depth players were posting negative on-ice shot-share numbers late in the regular season and in the first few rounds.

Begs the question – was the Oilers general manager ignorant to this information or just negligent?  And knowing that players like Nurse and Kane were struggling and making poor decisions and reads all over the ice, why was the coaching staff giving them more minutes at even-strength?

There are some very fundamental roster-construction strategies that the Oilers need to review this off-season. With a lot of inefficient contracts, aging players and major roster deficiencies, the Oilers have plenty of work to do. But they can’t approach it the same way they’ve done in the past. There has to be a focus on getting younger and quicker and being shrewder with contracts – especially for replacement-level players or those who struggle to have a positive impact on the team’s performance. While there’s a reputational risk of behaving this way, the Oilers have to be more focused on finding better players – not just those with personal connections to management or team personnel. The league is only getting more competitive, and the Oilers haven’t exactly loaded up on impactful prospects to keep pace. So, they’ll need a new approach to roster construction starting this off-season.

Data: Natural Stat Trick

How the Oilers and Panthers compare after the first four games of the finals

/ sunilagni / 1 Comment

It’s been a competitive series so far between the Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers, and I don’t think it’d be surprising to see this go to seven games. It’s really going to come down to who makes the most blunders, the timing, and who does a better job at capitalizing on them.

Edmonton has a path to securing a championship here if they can stop taking thoughtless penalties and get some saves on the penalty kill. Over the four games, they’ve done a good job adjusting the lineup and combinations at even-strength, handling Florida’s tactics and getting decent production. Based on their performance and results, they have a good shot at getting to sixteen wins this post-season.

Florida has so far outscored Edmonton 18-14, thanks in large part to their powerplay success. Florida has done slightly better at even-strength (5v5), outscoring Edmonton 9-8. But if you factor in 4v4 time, the goals are even at 10 goals each. On the powerplay, it’s not as though the Panthers are generating a ton of high-quality chances. Their rate of shots has improved in the finals compared to earlier in the post-season, but it’s nothing spectacular. Based on expected goals, they should have only four power play goals. But because of the Oilers shaky goaltending shorthanded, Florida has seven (or three more than expected). And the Oilers powerplay is underperforming slightly based on expected goal models. They should have five powerplay goals, but only have four (and they also allowed a short-handed goal). In summary: the Oilers need their special teams to be better.

Here’s a quick snapshot of how the two teams have performed at even-strength (5v5) after four games. Note that the shot-share metrics are score-adjusted.

Florida is doing a better job at controlling the flow of play, as measured by the Corsi For percentage. But when it comes to scoring chances, it’s a lot closer with Florida having an edge. Edmonton’s lower-than-normal shooting percentage has cost them a goal or two. But their goaltending has saved them a few more than expected at even-strength. The Oilers expected goals against is 11, but they’ve only allowed nine. It’s just on the penalty kill where the Oilers goaltending has been poor. More on that in a minute.

.

And here’s how the Oilers skaters have performed in the final series so far, and what their results have been. The skaters are split between forwards and defencemen, sorted by time on ice and have a heat map applied to show they compare with their teammates.

.

One really encouraging sign is that McDavid and Draisaitl’s results are likely due for a market correction – which would be perfect timing. Both currently have a negative goal-differential despite driving play and spending more time in the offensive zone. Along with Perry and Nugent-Hopkins in the top six, they should be able to convert on more of their chances just based on the skill level they have and the results they’ve posted all season. The middle order of the forwards does need tweaking, and I think the coaching staff has something to work with Henrique and Frederic. They along with J. Skinner could be the right mix, as others like Brown, Janmark and Arvidsson have struggled playing against Florida’s middle order and their systems. I’d also strongly consider fading Kane’s minutes as he’s been a bit of a liability with the penalties he takes and the lack of positive input he’s had on the game. Florida seems to have figured the Oilers depth out, so it doesn’t hurt to make adjustments, especially when a lot of the Oilers forwards have experience playing with one another over the course of the regular season.

On the back end, Bouchard continues to shine with whoever he plays with. Walman and Klingberg have also performed well, but Klingberg’s on-ice results are difficult to ignore. I would expect him back in the lineup after a game-off, especially with Stecher not being able gain the coaching staff’s trust in game four. And not much to add about Nurse as he remains a liability and shouldn’t see top pairing minutes. He’s better suited in a depth role at this point as he tends to drag down the numbers of every Oilers player he’s on the ice with.

And here’s how the Panthers skaters have performed over the four games.

.

The Oilers are doing a decent job at limiting the chances generated by the top line players like Reinhart and Verhaege, as well as Barkov whose performance numbers and results have been poor compared to what we’d expect from him. The Panthers second and third lines, which play a lot against Brown and Kane, as well as Nurse, have really taken advantage to control the flow of play and scoring chances. It’s clear that they’re using this middle order to target the Oilers weakest players. On the back-end, the Oilers should continue to target Forsling and Ekblad, as they tend to be on the ice for a lot of chances against. The Panthers are distributing the ice time quite well amongst the defencemen, but I do wonder if this group will wear out first as they take a lot of hits and haven’t rotated in a seventh defenceman yet.

Here’s how the goalies have performed this series, split by even-strength (5v5) and penalty kill and sorted by goals-saved-above-average. Pickard is giving the Oilers decent/average goaltending, which is more than what Skinner can provide at this point. As mentioned above, the Oilers goaltending has been fine at even-strength. It’s really on the penalty kill where they’ve struggled, with Pickard giving the team a better chance at winning games.

We’ll see what the Oilers coaching staff comes back with in game five in terms of lineup decisions and tactics.

Data: Natural Stat Trick

Bearing off

/ sunilagni / 1 Comment

This has to be it, right? The Edmonton Oilers get a second chance to win the Stanley Cup starting on Wednesday night against the Florida Panthers, which should be a very entertaining series. Both clubs have been dominant this post-season, and it felt kind of inevitable that they’d be going at it again. Pip count is near identical, now it comes down to the rolls – and hopefully things swing the Oilers way.

Here’s how the two clubs have done at even-strength this post-season. Both have dominated the scoresheets, each hovering around a near identical 62 percent goal-share. And their success has been supported by strong shot-share numbers – no surprise there.

What stands out here is the fact that the Oilers goaltending has been slightly better at even-strength this post-season, with the Panthers hovering closer to league average levels. Bobrovsky had a solid regular season, ranking 15th among 58 goalies who played at least 1,000 minutes in the regular season with a 91.9 percent save percentage. And a +8.53 goals-saved-above-average. Skinner, meanwhile, ranked 46th in save percentage (90.2 percent) and 48th in GSAA (-8.80). What that tells me is that Bobrovsky put together longer stretches of success in the regular season than Skinner – but it remains to be seen which one can do it first in the finals.

Both teams are also getting good results from across their rosters – scoring goals with and without their star players on the ice. Without one or both of McDavid or Draisaitl at even-strength, so about 50 percent of the team’s total time, the Oilers have posted a goal-share of 67.74 percent (21 goals for, 10 goals against). And on the other side, without one or both of Barkov or Tkachuk, about 46 percent of the team’s total time, the Panthers have also posted an exceptional goal-share of 66.67 percent (20 goals for, 10 against).

Where the Panthers depth players have an edge over Edmonton is their possession numbers, as measured by the Corsi For percentage (i.e., unblocked shot attempts). Edmonton tends to struggle controlling the overall flow of play, especially with Nurse on the ice with the depth players. In those situations (i.e., Nurse without one or both of McDavid or Draisaitl), the results have been good (9 GF/5 GA), but the team’s shot share metrics like Corsi and Expected Goals hover around 45 percent.

Here’s how the Panthers skaters have fared this post-season at even-strength, sorted by ice time, with a basic heat map applied to show how each player compares to their teammates.

While there are some players riding the PDO wave, like the Lundell/Marchand/Luostarinen line (who have been excellent), there are others like Reinhart who have the potential to see their scoring pop at evens. Reinhart’s on-ice shot-share numbers have been excellent, but he has only broken-even in terms of goals. Suspect the Panthers coaching staff will heavily target Darnell Nurse, as well as Henrique, Brown and Janmark. As I wrote recently, the Oilers tend to allow a lot of shots with these players on the ice – a trend that has continued since the regular season.

Should also note that the Panthers powerplay has only been alright. They’ve scored at a rate of 8.47 goals per hour, which is close to what they had in the regular season. They’re struggling to generate shots, sitting at a rate of 38 shots per hour, which is one of the lowest among all teams this post-season, and well below where they were in the regular season. The Panthers penalty kill on the other hand has been excellent. They’ve only allowed seven this post-season (a rate of 3.90 goals against per hour), which is one of the best in the league and half of what they allowed in the regular season. They’ve done an excellent job suppressing shots and making life easier for their goaltender – something the Oilers powerplay will have to figure out right away.

As I said at the top, both clubs have moved into their home boards and are in excellent position to win the game – but it’ll come down to the rolls. A bounce here and there, and hopefully someone getting the hot hand should allow Edmonton to bear off and win their first championship since 1990.

Data: Natural Stat Trick