Following a 29th place finish, the Oilers focused on their defence, and made significant changes  in the off-season acquiring Adam Larsson for Taylor Hall, and signing Kris Russell. Adding experienced players allowed them to push Nurse further down the depth chart, at an appropriate level for a developing prospect. And it allowed for the Oilers to push down defencemen like Reinhart and Oesterle to the minors where they could continue to develop.

A quick look at the 2015/16 defence group that played at least 100 minutes at 5v5, compared to the 2016/17 group (sorted by TOI).

Based on the group of defencemen, and the fact that they’ve been healthy for the most part, and the fact that the rate of goals against per 60 is down (goal differential of -36 to +22), my expectation was that the team improved this season in the following areas at even-strength (5v5):

• Fenwick against/60
• Shots against/60
• Expected goals against/60
• Scoring chances against/60
• Average shot distance against

Now these are all reflective of the things that teams probably want to be good at defensively and where teams would want to improve if they revamp their defence core. They want to limit the shots getting through (i.e., they block shots), they want to keep shots away from their net, keep pucks to the outside, they want to force low-probability shots and limit scoring chances.

Here’s a high-level summary, comparing the Oilers numbers from last season to this season. I’ve included their league ranking for each metric.

At first glance, it appears the Oilers have improved this season when it comes to the volume of shots against (Fenwick, Shots on goals). And when it comes to the quality of those shots (Scoring chances, expected goals), it appears they’re hasn’t been much of an improvement from last season. The key thing that jumps out is the team save percentage, which has been strong and consistent all year. But let’s take a look at each metric.

Fenwick Against/60

The Oilers saw their rate of unblocked shots against go down by 2 events per 60 minutes at 5v5 this season, which moved them from 24th overall to 9th. Below are the year-to-year numbers for the Oilers. Please note that in the graph below, the range (35 to 51) reflects the average league-wide range.

The Oilers have been much better at blocking shot attempts this season, blocking 28% (7th in the league) compared to 26% last season (15th in the league). What’s a little troubling is that the rate of unblocked shots against has gradually increased over the course of the 2016/17season, as the Oilers started off well, but have gradually been worse. Below is the rolling 25-game segments, with two lines: the 2015/16 season on the left and the 2016/17 season on the right.

The team finished with a  rate of 42.67 Fenwicks against/60 last season, and actually exceeded that rate for a 25-game stretch this season. I’d say the defence has been better, but they still haven’t ironed out some of the deficiencies from last season.

Shots Against/60

The Oilers saw their rate of shots on goals against per 60 drop by 1.18 this season. This doesn’t seem significant, but it moved the Oilers from being below league average to just around it.

But again, if we look at the rolling 25-game segments at 5v5, we see that the team is still having issues, especially in the most recent stretch where they’ve hovered around the same rate of shots against as last season. I find this pretty odd considering the Oilers defence core has been healthy all year, and the defence pairings have been consistent all year.

Scoring Chances Against/60

Now this I wasn’t expecting.

The rate of scoring chances against, as defined by Corsica, has actually increased this season, dropping them from 19th in the league to 26th.

It appears that last season, the club was a lot more consistent when it came to preventing scoring chances, hovering between 8 and 9 chances per 60. This season they’ve struggled, as they’ve shown signs of improvement, dropping from around 10 chances per hour down to 7. But this gradually got worse again, even surpassing last season’s worst stretch.

What’s worth noting here is that the average distance of the shots against has dropped, meaning the shots against are getting closer. The Oilers are 30th in league when it comes to this metric, meaning Talbot is getting shot at from a lot closer than past seasons. This leads us to our measure for shot quality.

Expected Goals Against/60

This is a weighting placed on every unblocked shot based on the probability of the shot becoming a goal. This depends on the type of shot, location and uses historical shot and goals data to come up with the probability for each unblocked shot. This captures a lot more data compared to scoring chances, as every unblocked shot against is included, and also does a good job of predicting future goals. (Detailed explanation can be found at Corsica Hockey).

It appears that when it comes to expected goals against, the Oilers have been worse this season compared to last, dropping from 23rd to 24th in the league. So while the team is preventing more shots from getting through (i.e., they’re blocking more shots), the shots they allow are of the higher quality, and the ones more likely to becoming goals.

What’s worse is that the rate of expected goals against has gradually increased this season, again surpassing some of the worst stretches from last season.

Summary

My takeaway from this is that the team hasn’t really improved when it comes to the defensive side of the game, making only marginal progress when it comes to the rate of shots against, but actually getting worse when it comes to the quality of those shots against. This is pretty disappointing considering the cost of acquiring Larsson, and some of the narratives about this team being more balanced on the back-end and being harder to play against.

The biggest factor that has driven down the rate of goals against has been Cam Talbot, who has started the vast majority of games this season. First, a quick glance at the team’s save percentage year over year:

The club went from having the second worst team save percentage last season to the 9th best this season. What’s even better is that the save percentage has trended upwards over the course of this season, with the club even reaching 94% (!!) for a 25-game stretch.

Without Talbot’s improved play from last season, there is no way this team would be contending for a division title. While the Oilers even-strength offence is relying heavily on McDavid, it appears that the drop in goals against is largely due to Talbot, and not the defence core.

Data: Corsica Hockey

7

Something that’s been of interest to me lately is how the Oilers might be slowing down Connor McDavid’s offence. He leads the league in points with 87, but I honestly believe that if he had a better defence core behind him, he could’ve been further ahead than the rest of the group.

Here’s how the scoring race looks today:

My thought is that if your team has the puck more often, then that should increase your odds of putting up points (EDIT: and having a higher goal share). I’ll use Corsi For% (i.e., shot attempts) as my proxy, and I think for the most part it checks out. It also predicts future goal-share quite well.

Here’s each player’s team’s Corsi For% at 5v5 this season.

So of the five leading scorers, McDavid’s club ranks 19th in the league with a Corsi For% of 49.8%. And his competitors in the scoring race are all on teams that have at least a 50.5% share of the shot attempts.

Next, it’s worth seeing how each of the top five players does with the defence core they have. Defencemen are a big part of each player’s success, as having a balanced group that can skate and move the puck well will make a significant difference. What I really want to see here is what kind of support each of the leading scorers gets, and if any of them are being dragged down.

Here’a a quick breakdown of each of the top five scorers and their on-ice Corsi For percentages with their most common defencemen this season (minimum 100 minutes together at 5v5). Defencemen are listed in descending order by ice time with the player.

McDavid

As expected, when McDavid is on the ice with Russell, the team’s CF% drops to 47.5%. The next lowest is with Sekera, at just under 51%. With Russell, the rate of shot attempts for drops to 53.64, while with anyone else, it’s higher than that. It’s obvious Russell is a drag on McDavid, but the fact that the shots for drop should raise some concern for the coaching staff.

That’s more than 360 minutes that McDavid has to basically carry around Russell and get outshot doing so, which makes you wonder how much better the point totals would be had the Oilers found a more talented, not necessarily elite, right shot defenceman last summer. Russell is a capable NHL defenceman who can contribute as a depth player, but it should be obvious to anyone watching this team that he’s playing above his established level. It really would make no sense to retain a player who hampers your best player’s offence.

Related: Holding Back McDavid – The Copper & Blue (2017, March 22)

Crosby

Kane

Marchand

Kucherov

Of the four players, only Kane posts a CF% less than 50% with one defenceman (49.0% with Campbell). Crosby, Marchand and Kucherov all post a CF% above 50% with every single defenceman they’ve played with for at least 100 minutes this season. Must be nice.

I hope this also squashes the whole “Russell plays tough minutes” thing. The Oilers roll out their top two pairs equally, with Klefbom/Larsson and Sekera/Russell seeing similar levels of competition. Every one of those defence groups listed above has a pair that plays tough competition, but they can still post a CF% of 50% with their best offensive forward on the ice. So let’s stop using the excuse of Russell playing against top lines or taking more defensive zone starts. His 47.5% CF% with McDavid is unacceptable and needs to be addressed.

Takeaway

The Oilers have quite possibly the best player in the world on their team that will hopefully be their franchise cornerstone for a long time. Surrounding him with talent should have been the number one priority when they won the draft lottery with the focus being on winning a championship. The club did make some good moves by acquiring Talbot and Maroon, signing Sekera as a UFA and signing Klefbom to a long-term deal. But the fact that they brought in someone like Russell, who has a long history of dragging down the offence of his team, makes me wonder what exactly they were thinking. It did help push the younger, developing  players like Nurse, Reinhart and Oesterle down the depth chart, and added some experience to the roster. But the point of the game is to generate offence, and the fact that one of the elite offensive talents in the league has to spend that much of his time with someone playing above his established level is mind-boggling.

It will be imperative that the Oilers surround McDavid with the best possible defence core that can support him offensively and not be a significant drag on his production.If the end goal for management is a championship, it’s their responsibility to take action.

Data: Hockey Analysis

Something that’s bothered me for a while is the lack of real skill and talent in the NHL. Ideally, the league would have fewer teams, create more competition for spots and ice lineups that are better loaded with skill and goal-scoring ability.

The way it works in the NHL today is that you’ll have a small group of true contenders, teams with talent that can score and have an entertaining product. Then there’s a big group of average teams, with decent rosters but plenty of holes preventing them from becoming legitimate contenders. And then you have the junk teams that appear to be contending for a playoff spot, but really aren’t when you factor in the three-point/loser point system.

The issue for thes bad teams is typically poor roster construction around their skilled players and the lack of depth, especially on defence. Think of the Oilers, Avalanche and Coyotes and some of the terrible decisions they’re management teams have made. What’s especially bothersome is when talented, elite players have to spend the prime of their professional careers with these loser organizations.

A prime example that comes to mind, for obvious reasons, is 26 year old Taylor Hall. After being drafted in 2010 by the Oilers, the winger played six full seasons as the team’s top line winger, before being moved to New Jersey. Here’s how his team’s have done with and without him at even-strength.

Brutal.

In Edmonton, he was an offensive driver, as the team was just able to outscore opponents when he was on the ice. Without him, a goal-share of 40%. It appears that the same thing is happening now in New Jersey as Hall continues to be the offensive driver, but he’s again surrounded by a terrible roster that is garbage without him. He is being paid for his work, but it’s got to be frustrating losing this often.

Side note: Hall is signed with the Devils for three more seasons at $6M per season, and is a UFA at age 28. The others signed to long term deals in New Jersey: Zajac (31), Palmieri, and Andy Greene (34) and Cory Schneider (30). (Cap Friendly)

It’s seeing numbers like in the graphs above that makes me question why players, whose skill and talent is what draws people to the game, don’t have more control over their futures. Hall did sign an extension with the Oilers, but he and every other player entering the league are under team control most often for the duration of their prime years (up to age 27). And it really makes me wonder if NHL owners have enough incentives to actually build a winning team.

Data: Corsica Hockey